Comprehensive Overview of Immigration Law (COIL) Practice Exam

If Wu is placed in removal proceedings due to his past conviction, what will he be charged with?

1. Inadmissibility due to moral turpitude

2. Deportability due to a felony conviction

3. Deportability due to unlawful presence

4. Inadmissibility for drug abuse

The correct answer is: Deportability due to a felony conviction

The situation involves Wu being placed in removal proceedings due to a past conviction. In U.S. immigration law, deportability refers specifically to the reasons that form the basis for an individual to be removed from the country once they are already in it. A felony conviction is a serious offense that typically leads to deportation proceedings, as it often falls under categories that make an individual removable. In Wu's case, being charged with deportability due to a felony conviction aligns with the legal framework that addresses how convictions can impact an individual's immigration status. This can include definitions of crimes involving moral turpitude, aggravated felonies, or other serious offenses, which can trigger removal proceedings. In contrast, the other options pertain to different grounds for removal or inadmissibility that are not specifically relevant to Wu's past conviction in this scenario. For example, inadmissibility for moral turpitude generally applies when assessing entry into the U.S. rather than removal from it, while unlawful presence does not directly relate to a conviction but rather to how long someone has remained in the country illegally. Likewise, drug abuse can lead to inadmissibility, but it is distinct from deportability due to criminal conviction. Thus, the focus on deportability relating to a felony conviction